AI audit vs rubric — CJDropshipping
An independent Workers AI LLM scored CJDropshipping against the same published rubric. The deterministic rubric result is our canonical score. The LLM's result is shown here as a sanity check — never mixed into the scoring formula.
| Dimension | Rubric | LLM | Δ (LLM − Rubric) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 84 | 20 | -64 |
| Business transparency | 40 | 25 | -15 |
| Shipping clarity | 92 | 85 | -7 |
| Public reviews | 88 | 88 | 0 |
| Product range | 95 | 92 | -3 |
| Access & onboarding | 95 | 90 | -5 |
| Support track record | 80 | 80 | 0 |
| Store integrations | 85 | 75 | -10 |
| Overall | 81 | 76 | -5 |
What this means: Moderate disagreement — rubric bands may need tightening. Median per-dimension |Δ| is between 5 and 15.
Median per-dimension |Δ| = 6.
Pricing transparency is low because the source price is not visible. Business transparency is low because the company is not publicly listed and audited statements are not available. Shipping clarity is high because origins and delivery windows are clearly published per region. Review score is high because it's 4.7+ stars across 1000+ reviews on 2+ sources. Product range is high because it's 10M+ SKUs. Access is high because there's a free plan with no signup required to browse. Support is high because it's mostly positive, few complaints. Integration is high because there are native integrations with 4-5 platforms.This is the LLM's own explanation, not editorial commentary from SupplierSpy. The LLM result is a sanity check on the rubric — never mixed into the scoring formula.