AI audit vs rubric — DSers
An independent Workers AI LLM scored DSers against the same published rubric. The deterministic rubric result is our canonical score. The LLM's result is shown here as a sanity check — never mixed into the scoring formula.
| Dimension | Rubric | LLM | Δ (LLM − Rubric) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 84 | 45 | -39 |
| Business transparency | 40 | 25 | -15 |
| Shipping clarity | 70 | 40 | -30 |
| Public reviews | 92 | 0 | -92 |
| Product range | 95 | 70 | -25 |
| Access & onboarding | 95 | 90 | -5 |
| Support track record | 82 | 0 | -82 |
| Store integrations | 85 | 60 | -25 |
| Overall | 79 | 45 | -34 |
What this means: Large disagreement — investigate. The LLM read the published signals very differently from the deterministic rules.
Median per-dimension |Δ| = 27.5.
DSers's pricing is transparent, but not entirely clear. Business transparency is lacking, with no public listing or audited statements. Shipping clarity is also limited, with only generic information available. Review scores are not provided, and the product range is substantial but not entirely clear. Access is easy, with a free plan available. Support is nonexistent, and integration is limited to four platforms.This is the LLM's own explanation, not editorial commentary from SupplierSpy. The LLM result is a sanity check on the rubric — never mixed into the scoring formula.