AI audit vs rubric — Trendsi
An independent Workers AI LLM scored Trendsi against the same published rubric. The deterministic rubric result is our canonical score. The LLM's result is shown here as a sanity check — never mixed into the scoring formula.
| Dimension | Rubric | LLM | Δ (LLM − Rubric) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 84 | 20 | -64 |
| Business transparency | 40 | 25 | -15 |
| Shipping clarity | 92 | 85 | -7 |
| Public reviews | 92 | 0 | -92 |
| Product range | 75 | 70 | -5 |
| Access & onboarding | 95 | 90 | -5 |
| Support track record | 88 | 85 | -3 |
| Store integrations | 72 | 60 | -12 |
| Overall | 79 | 56 | -23 |
What this means: Moderate disagreement — rubric bands may need tightening. Median per-dimension |Δ| is between 5 and 15.
Median per-dimension |Δ| = 9.5.
Pricing transparency is low because pricing is only visible after signup. Business transparency is low because the company is not publicly listed and audited statements are not available. Review score is 0 because there are no reviews. Product range is moderate because there are 100K+ SKUs available. Access is high because a free plan is available with no signup required. Support is high because customer support feedback is consistently positive. Integration is moderate because there are only 2 native integrations with e-commerce platforms.This is the LLM's own explanation, not editorial commentary from SupplierSpy. The LLM result is a sanity check on the rubric — never mixed into the scoring formula.