AI audit vs rubric — Worldwide Brands
An independent Workers AI LLM scored Worldwide Brands against the same published rubric. The deterministic rubric result is our canonical score. The LLM's result is shown here as a sanity check — never mixed into the scoring formula.
| Dimension | Rubric | LLM | Δ (LLM − Rubric) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 84 | 45 | -39 |
| Business transparency | 55 | 45 | -10 |
| Shipping clarity | 70 | 40 | -30 |
| Public reviews | 72 | 72 | 0 |
| Product range | 95 | 92 | -3 |
| Access & onboarding | 45 | 40 | -5 |
| Support track record | 72 | 72 | 0 |
| Store integrations | 25 | 0 | -25 |
| Overall | 68 | 49 | -19 |
What this means: Moderate disagreement — rubric bands may need tightening. Median per-dimension |Δ| is between 5 and 15.
Median per-dimension |Δ| = 7.5.
No native integrations with e-commerce platforms are available. (worldwide-brands.platform_integration_count=0)This is the LLM's own explanation, not editorial commentary from SupplierSpy. The LLM result is a sanity check on the rubric — never mixed into the scoring formula.