AI audit vs rubric — CJDropshipping
An independent Workers AI LLM scored CJDropshipping against the same published rubric. The deterministic rubric result is our canonical score. The LLM's result is shown here as a sanity check — never mixed into the scoring formula.
| Dimension | Rubric | LLM | Δ (LLM − Rubric) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 84 | 20 | -64 |
| Business transparency | 40 | 25 | -15 |
| Shipping clarity | 92 | 85 | -7 |
| Public reviews | 88 | 0 | -88 |
| Product range | 95 | 92 | -3 |
| Access & onboarding | 95 | 90 | -5 |
| Support track record | 80 | 80 | 0 |
| Store integrations | 85 | 75 | -10 |
| Overall | 81 | 63 | -18 |
What this means: Moderate disagreement — rubric bands may need tightening. Median per-dimension |Δ| is between 5 and 15.
Median per-dimension |Δ| = 8.5.
Pricing transparency is low because the source price is not visible. Business transparency is low because the company is not publicly listed and audited statements are not available. Review score is 0 because the hint is below the threshold. Product range is high because the catalog size estimate is 10M+. Access is high because a free plan is available without signup. Support is high because the hint is above the threshold. Integration is high because 5 platforms are supported.This is the LLM's own explanation, not editorial commentary from SupplierSpy. The LLM result is a sanity check on the rubric — never mixed into the scoring formula.