AI audit vs rubric — Wholesale Central
An independent Workers AI LLM scored Wholesale Central against the same published rubric. The deterministic rubric result is our canonical score. The LLM's result is shown here as a sanity check — never mixed into the scoring formula.
| Dimension | Rubric | LLM | Δ (LLM − Rubric) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 84 | 20 | -64 |
| Business transparency | 25 | 0 | -25 |
| Shipping clarity | 70 | 40 | -30 |
| Public reviews | 70 | 60 | -10 |
| Product range | 85 | 70 | -15 |
| Access & onboarding | 95 | 90 | -5 |
| Support track record | 60 | 60 | 0 |
| Store integrations | 25 | 0 | -25 |
| Overall | 66 | 36 | -30 |
What this means: Large disagreement — investigate. The LLM read the published signals very differently from the deterministic rules.
Median per-dimension |Δ| = 20.
Low business transparency due to lack of publicly listed company and audited statements. Poor shipping clarity as only origins are stated. Review score is based on a fallback value. Product range is estimated to be 1M+ SKUs. Access is easy with a free plan and no signup required to browse. Support is mostly positive with few complaints. No platform integrations are available.This is the LLM's own explanation, not editorial commentary from SupplierSpy. The LLM result is a sanity check on the rubric — never mixed into the scoring formula.