AI audit vs rubric — AliExpress
An independent Workers AI LLM scored AliExpress against the same published rubric. The deterministic rubric result is our canonical score. The LLM's result is shown here as a sanity check — never mixed into the scoring formula.
| Dimension | Rubric | LLM | Δ (LLM − Rubric) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 72 | 20 | -52 |
| Business transparency | 85 | 80 | -5 |
| Shipping clarity | 70 | 65 | -5 |
| Public reviews | 80 | 75 | -5 |
| Product range | 95 | 92 | -3 |
| Access & onboarding | 95 | 90 | -5 |
| Support track record | 65 | 65 | 0 |
| Store integrations | 72 | 40 | -32 |
| Overall | 79 | 67 | -12 |
What this means: Strong agreement — the rubric appears well-specified. Median per-dimension |Δ| ≤ 5.
Median per-dimension |Δ| = 5.
Pricing transparency is low because pricing is not visible without signup. Business transparency is high because the company is publicly listed and has audited statements. Shipping clarity is moderate because delivery windows are per region but origins are stated. Review score is moderate because it's between 4.3-4.7 stars. Product range is high because it has 10M+ SKUs. Access is high because there's a free plan with no signup required to browse. Support is moderate because there's mostly positive feedback. Integration is low because there's only native integration with one platform.This is the LLM's own explanation, not editorial commentary from SupplierSpy. The LLM result is a sanity check on the rubric — never mixed into the scoring formula.