AI audit vs rubric — AliExpress
An independent Workers AI LLM scored AliExpress against the same published rubric. The deterministic rubric result is our canonical score. The LLM's result is shown here as a sanity check — never mixed into the scoring formula.
| Dimension | Rubric | LLM | Δ (LLM − Rubric) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 72 | 20 | -52 |
| Business transparency | 85 | 80 | -5 |
| Shipping clarity | 70 | 65 | -5 |
| Public reviews | 80 | 75 | -5 |
| Product range | 95 | 92 | -3 |
| Access & onboarding | 95 | 90 | -5 |
| Support track record | 65 | 65 | 0 |
| Store integrations | 72 | 40 | -32 |
| Overall | 79 | 68 | -11 |
What this means: Strong agreement — the rubric appears well-specified. Median per-dimension |Δ| ≤ 5.
Median per-dimension |Δ| = 5.
pricingTransparency: Pricing not visible without signup. businessTransparency: Public parent company, named legal entity, and audited statements. shippingClarity: Delivery windows per region, but origins not per region. reviewScore: 4.3-4.7 stars, 500+ reviews. productRange: 10M+ SKUs. access: Free plan, no signup required to browse. support: Mostly positive, few complaints. integration: One platform.This is the LLM's own explanation, not editorial commentary from SupplierSpy. The LLM result is a sanity check on the rubric — never mixed into the scoring formula.