AI audit vs rubric — Doba
An independent Workers AI LLM scored Doba against the same published rubric. The deterministic rubric result is our canonical score. The LLM's result is shown here as a sanity check — never mixed into the scoring formula.
| Dimension | Rubric | LLM | Δ (LLM − Rubric) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 84 | 20 | -64 |
| Business transparency | 40 | 25 | -15 |
| Shipping clarity | 70 | 40 | -30 |
| Public reviews | 75 | 0 | -75 |
| Product range | 85 | 55 | -30 |
| Access & onboarding | 65 | 40 | -25 |
| Support track record | 72 | 0 | -72 |
| Store integrations | 85 | 40 | -45 |
| Overall | 71 | 34 | -37 |
What this means: Large disagreement — investigate. The LLM read the published signals very differently from the deterministic rules.
Median per-dimension |Δ| = 37.5.
Doba's pricing is opaque, requiring signup to view. Business transparency is limited, with no publicly listed company or audited statements. Shipping information is generic, and no delivery windows are provided. Review score is unknown. Product range is estimated at 2M+ SKUs. Access requires signup to browse, and support has consistently poor feedback. Integration is limited to 5 platforms.This is the LLM's own explanation, not editorial commentary from SupplierSpy. The LLM result is a sanity check on the rubric — never mixed into the scoring formula.