AI audit vs rubric — Doba
An independent Workers AI LLM scored Doba against the same published rubric. The deterministic rubric result is our canonical score. The LLM's result is shown here as a sanity check — never mixed into the scoring formula.
| Dimension | Rubric | LLM | Δ (LLM − Rubric) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 84 | 20 | -64 |
| Business transparency | 40 | 25 | -15 |
| Shipping clarity | 70 | 40 | -30 |
| Public reviews | 75 | 0 | -75 |
| Product range | 85 | 55 | -30 |
| Access & onboarding | 65 | 40 | -25 |
| Support track record | 72 | 0 | -72 |
| Store integrations | 85 | 40 | -45 |
| Overall | 71 | 30 | -41 |
What this means: Large disagreement — investigate. The LLM read the published signals very differently from the deterministic rules.
Median per-dimension |Δ| = 37.5.
Doba's pricing is opaque, requiring signup to view pricing. Business transparency is limited, with no publicly listed company and no audited statements. Shipping clarity is low, with only origins stated. Review score is unknown. Product range is moderate, with 2M SKUs. Access is limited, requiring signup to browse. Support is consistently poor. Integration is moderate, with 5 platforms.This is the LLM's own explanation, not editorial commentary from SupplierSpy. The LLM result is a sanity check on the rubric — never mixed into the scoring formula.